Dyre ord, men hvad dækker de?
Teori, metode og model i retorisk kritik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v6i23.256Abstract
Begreberne retorisk analyse og retorisk kritik og deres indbyrdes forhold savner ofte præcisering. Navnlig spørgsmål om metode og teori er problematiske for mange, der i øvrigt har solidt kendskab til retorik og gode evner for at arbejde med retoriske tekster. Artiklen giver et signalement af retorisk kritik og redegør for begreberne teori, metode og model som de udfolder sig i retorisk kritik.
References
Arthos, John (2002): “Chapman’s Coatesville Address: A Hermeneutic Reading”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech, nr. 88, s. 193-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630209384370
Bitzer, Lloyd F. (1968): “The Rhetorical Situation”, i: Rhetoric and Philosophy 1, s. 1-14.
––– (1997): “Den retoriske situation”, oversat af Jens E. Kjeldsen, i: Rhetorica Scandinavica 3, s. 9-17.
Bormann, E.G. (1972): “Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech 58, s. 396-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637209383138
Brock, Bernhard L., Robert L. Scott og James W. Chesebro (red.) (1989): Methods of Rhetorical Criticism. A Twentieth-Century Perspective. 3rd ed. Wayne State University Press, Detroit.
Brockriede, Wayne (1974): “Rhetorical Criticism as Argument”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech 60, s. 165-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637409383222
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs (1974): “Criticism: Ephemeral and Enduring”, i: Speech Teacher 23, s. 9-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634527409378050
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs og Thomas R. Burkholder (1997): Critiques of Contemporary Rhetoric. 2nd ed. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont.
Darsey, James (1994): “Must We All be Rhetorical Theorists?: An Anti-Democratic Inquiry”, i: Western Journal of Communication 58, s. 164-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319409374494
Farrell, Thomas B. (1980): “Critical Models in the Analysis of Discourse”, i: Western Journal of Speech Communication 44, s. 300-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318009374016
Faye, Jan (2000): Athenes Kammer. En filosofisk indføring i videnskabernes enhed. Høst og Søns Forlag, København.
––––– (2002): ”Forståelse og fortolkning i humanvidenskaberne”, i: Filosofiske Studier 22, s. 6-31.
Fiske, John (1991): Introduction to Communication Studies. 2nd ed. Routledge, London.
Foss, Sonja K. (1989): Rhetorical Criticism. Exploration & Practice. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Illinois.
Foss, Sonja K., Karen A. Foss og Robert Trapp (1991): Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric. 2nd ed. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Illinois.
Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar (1990): ”Object and Method in Rhetorical Criticism: From Wichelns to Leff and McGee”, i: Western Journal of Communication 54, s. 290-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319009374344
Hart, Roderick P. (1997): Modern Rhetorical Criticism. 2. udg. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
Hollihan, Thomas A. og Patricia Riley (1987): “The Rhetorical Power of a Compelling Story. A Critique of a ‘Toughlove’ Parental Support Group”, i: Communication Quarterly 35, s. 13-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378709369667
Hubbard, Rita C. (1985): “Relationship Styles in Poplar Romance Novels, 1950 to 1983”, i: Communication Quarterly 33, s. 113-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378509369587
Ivie, Robert L. (1974): “Presidential Motives for War”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech 60, s. 337-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637409383241
Ivie, Robert L. (1987): “Metaphor and the Rhetorical Invention of Cold War ’Idealists’”, i: Communication Monographs 54, s. 165-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758709390224
Jasinski, James (2001): “The Status of Theory and Method in Rhetorical Criticism”, i: Western Journal of Communication 65, s. 249-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310109374705
Jørgensen, Charlotte (2000): ”Hvem bestemmer hvad der er god retorik?”, i: Rhetorica Scandinavica 15, s. 34-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52610/SDIT5700
Klumpp, James F. og Thomas A. Hollihan (1989): “Rhetorical Criticism as Moral Action”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech 75, s. 84-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638909383863
Leff, Michael C. og G. P. Mohrmann (1974): “Lincoln at Cooper Union: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Text”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech 40, s. 346-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637409383242
Leff, Michael C. (1974): “Lincoln at Cooper Union: A Rationale for Neo-Classical Criticism”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech 40, s. 459-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637409383255
Miller, Carolyn R. (1984): “Genre as Social Action”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, s. 151-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686
Morris III, Charles E. (2002): “Pink Herring & The Fourth Persona: J. Edgar Hoover’s Sex Crime Panic”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech, nr. 88, s. 228-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630209384372
Nothstine, William L., Carole Blair, Gary A. Copeland (1994): Critical Questions. Invention, Creativity, and the Criticism of Discourse and Media. St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Parry-Giles, Trevor og Shawn J. Parry-Giles. (2002): ”The West Wing’s Prime Time Presidentiality: Mimesis and Catharsis in a Postmodern Romance”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech, nr. 88, s. 209-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630209384371
Rienecker, Lotte og Peter Stray Jørgensen med flere (2000): Den gode opgave – opgaveskrivning på videregående uddannelser, 2. rev. udg. Samfundslitteratur, Frederiksberg.
Rosenfield, Lawrence W. (1968): “The Anatomy of Critical Discourse”, i: Speech Monographs 35, 50-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756809375565
Stein, Sarah R. (2002): “The ‘1984’ Macintosh Ad: Cinematic Icons and Constitutive Rhetoric in the Launch of a New Machine”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech, nr. 88, s. 169-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630209384369
Ware, B.L. og Wil A. Linkugel (1973): “They Spoke in Defense of Themselves”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech 59, s. 273-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383176
Zaeske, Susan (2002): “Signatures of Citizenship: The Rhetoric of Women’s Anti-slavery Petition”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech, nr. 88, s. 147-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630209384368
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rhetorica Scandinavica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
