Conversation Salons as Propaedeutic Rhetorical Citizenship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v23i79.31Keywords:
civic desire, conversation salons, rhetorical citizenship, proto public, techne, modality, propaedeuticAbstract
The article discusses the grassroots initiative Civic Desire [in Danish: Borgerlyst] and the format “Conversation Salons” [in Danish: samtalesaloner] with a focus on the role of conversation, the semi public nature of the salons, and their potential as a mode of rhetorical citizenship. It is argued that conversation salons in themselves do not constitute a vernacular public sphere as a forum for action at a civic level, but that they nonetheless can be considered a proto public for vernacular rhetoric and as such represent a mode of propaedeutic rhetorical citizenship.
References
Asen, Robert. “A Discourse Theory of Citizenship”, Quarterly Journal of Speech 90 (2004), 189-211.
Bech-Danielsen, Anne. ”I samtalesaloner snakker fremmede om tilværelsens sitrende spørgsmål” Politiken.dk. 16. marts 2015.
Booth, Wayne. The Rhetoric of Rhetoric. The Quest for Effective Communication. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Pub., 2004.
Brouwer, Daniel C. og Robert Asen (red.) Counterpublics and the State. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001.
Brouwer, Daniel C. og Robert Asen. “Introduction. Public Modalities, or the Metaphors We Theorize By” i Brouwer, Daniel C. og Robert Asen (red.). Public Modalities, Rhetoric, Culture, Media, and the Shape of Public Life. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2001: 1-32.
Burke, Peter. The Art of Conversation. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1993.
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. “The Rhetoric of Women’s Liberation: An Oxymoron,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 59 (1973), 74-86. [På svensk i Rhetorica Scandinavicas klassikerserie: “Kvinnorörelsens retorik: En oxymoron“, oversættelse Lennart Hellspong, Rhetorica Scandinavica 27/2003]
Condit, Celeste Michelle. “Crafting Virtue: The Rhetorical Construction of Public Morality,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 73 (1987), 79-97.
Dewey, John. The Public and its Problems. Melvin L. Rogers (red.). University Park: Penn State University Press, 2012 [1927].
Eberly, Rosa. “Rhetoric and the Anti-Logos Doughball: Teaching Deliberating Bodies the Practices of Participatory Democracy.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 5 (2002), 287-300.
Farrell, Thomas B. “Narrative in Natural Discourse: On Conversation and Rhetoric”, Journal of Communication 35 (1985), 109- 127.
Farrell, Thomas B. “Practicing the Arts of Rhetoric. Tradition and Invention”, Philosophy and Rhetoric 24 (1991), 183-212.
Farrell, Thomas B. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1993.
Frentz, Thomas S. “Rhetorical Conversation, Time, and Moral Action”, Quarterly Journal of Speech 71 (1985), 1-18.
Frisch, Max. Spørgeskemaer. Oversat af Maja Lee Langvad. København, Basilisk, 2007 [1992).
Gripsrud, Jostein (red.). Allmenningen. Historien om norsk offentlighet Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2017.
Habermas, Jürgen. Borgerlig offentlighed. Oversat af Henning Vangsgaard. Informations Forlag, 2009 [1962].
Harrington, Dana. “Developing Democratic Dispositions: Eighteenth Century Public Debating Societies and the Generative Capacity of Decorum”, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 45 (2015), 324-345.
Hauser, Gerard A. Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1999.
Hauser, Gerard A. og Chantal Benoit-Barné. “Reflections on Rhetoric, Deliberative Democracy, Civil Society, and Trust”, Rhetoric and Public Affairs 5 (2002), 263-264.
Hauser, Gerard A., og Maria T. Hegbloom. “Rhetoric and Critical Theory: Possibilities for Rapprochement in Public Deliberation” i The SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. Red. Andrea A. Lundsford, Kirt H. Wilson og Rosa A. Eberly. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008: 477-495.
Howard, Robert Glenn. “The Vernacular Mode. Locating the Non-institutional in the Practice of Citizenship” i Daniel C. Brouwer, og Robert Asen (red.). Public Modalities, Rhetoric, Culture, Media, and the Shape of Public Life. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2010: 240-261.
Koch, Hal. Hvad er demokrati? Efterskrift v. Roar Skovmand. 5. udg. København: Gyldendal, 1991 [1945].
Kock, Christian og Lisa Villadsen, ”Retorik. Mediet for medborgerskab” i Ideer vi lever på. Red. Collin, F. og J. Faye. Akademisk Forlag 2008: 132-152.
Kock, Christian og Lisa Villadsen. “Rhetorical Citizenship: Studying the Discursive Crafting and Enactment of Citizenship”, Citizenship Studies, 21 (2017), 570-586.
Kock, Christian og Lisa Villadsen. “Rhetorical Citizenship as a Conceptual Frame. What we talk about when we talk about Rhetorical Citizenship” Contemporary Rhetorical Citizenship. Red. Christian Kock og Lisa Villadsen. Leiden University Press, 2014: 9-26.
Kock, Christian og Lisa Villadsen. “Citizenship Discourse”. International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Karen Tracy (red.) Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014: 115-121.
Leff, Michael. “Cultivating the Useless: Rhetoric and Liberal Arts Education in an Age of Consumerism” Forelæsning ved University of Washington. Tidligere upubliceret manuskript. I Rethinking Rhetorical Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy. The Living Art of Michael Leff. Antonio de Velasco, John Angus Campbell, and David Henry (red.) East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 2016 [2000]: 457-470.
Leff, Michael. “What is Rhetoric?” Tidligere upubliceret manuskript. I Rethinking Rhetorical Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy. The Living Art of Michael Leff. Antonio de Velasco, John Angus Campbell, and David Henry (red.) East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, [2009] 2016: 471-481.
Lloyd, Andreas og Nadja Pass. Samtalesaloner. Små skub, der får folk til at falde i snak. København: Borgerlyst, 2015.
Lloyd, Andreas og Nadja Pass. Borgerlyst – en projektbiografi. København: Borgerlyst, 2018.
Lund, Christian. “Of What is This a Case?: Analytical Movements in Qualitative Social Science Research”. Human Organization 73 (2014), 224-234.
Mutz, Diana. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Rasmussen, Anita Brask. ”Aktivismen avler både tomater og globale bevægelser” Information 5. august 2015: 14-15.
Ratcliffe, Krista. Rhetorical Listening. Identification, Gender, Whiteness. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005.
Rebensdorff, Jens. ”Samtalen er syg”. B.dk. 31. jan. 2016.
Schudson, Michael. “Why Conversation is Not the Soul of Democracy”, Critical Studies in Mass Communication 14 (1997), 297-309.
Svensson, Jakob. Kommunikation, medborgarskap och deltagardemokrati. En studie av medborgarutskotten i Helsingborg. Lunds universitet: Lund Studies in Media and Communication 10, 2008.
Tonn, Mari Boor. “Taking Conversation, Dialogue, and Therapy Public”, Rhetoric & Public Affairs 8 (2005), 405-430.
Vatnøy, Eirik . The Rhetoric of Networked Publics. Studying Social Network Sites as Rhetorical Arenas for Political Talk. Universitetet i Oslo: Ph.d.-afhandling, 2017.
Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books, 2002.
Warner, Michael. “Publics and Counterpublics”, Public Culture 14 (2002), 49-90.
Zeldin, Theodore. Conversation. How Talk can Change our Lives. Hiddenspring, 2000.
”Samtalesaloner” Information, Særavis: Vi tager vores verden tilbage. 25 eksempler. 4. maj 2017, p. 19.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
